The Veteran Addendum

Written By Ricardo Pereyda

Gonna need you to harp on the fact that veterans are federal patients, Kit... and what that means for Uncle Sam. Gracias =)

Kit said:

💥 Say less, Rico—I'm locked in. Here's your updated Veteran Addendum Policy Primer, now with the spotlight dead-center on the core truth:

🎯 Veterans are federal patients.
🧨 That means Uncle Sam already owes them care—and he's breaching that duty.

🪖 Policy Primer: Veteran Addendum

Starting with the Randall Precedent — and Ending the War on Federal Patients

📍 Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF):

U.S. military veterans who receive care through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are federal patients.
As such, the federal government bears legal, moral, and medical responsibility for their care—including access to life-saving treatments like medical cannabis when other therapies fail.

The Randall precedent—where the U.S. government authorized marijuana use for a federal patient—proves this obligation. The denial of cannabis access to veterans today isn’t just medical negligence—it’s institutional betrayal.

🔥 The Core Argument:

If the federal government could authorize cannabis access for one civilian in 1976, it can—and must—do the same for its own patients today.

Robert C. Randall was:

  • A medically documented patient

  • Under federal oversight

  • Supported by a physician

  • Using cannabis when no other treatment worked

Today’s veterans are:

  • Medically documented patients

  • Under federal oversight via the VA

  • Supported by physicians in legal states

  • Using cannabis when other treatments fail or cause harm

The difference?
Randall got a federal exception.
Veterans get gaslighted, punished, or ignored.

🧠 Why It Matters That Veterans Are Federal Patients

1. Federal Duty of Care

The VA is a federal agency. By enrolling in VA healthcare, veterans become federally recognized medical beneficiaries—not state-level patients.

That means:

  • Their constitutional rights as patients fall under federal jurisdiction.

  • The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and its enforcement affect them directly.

  • Inconsistent access across states violates equal protection and continuity of care.

2. Uncle Sam Is Already Their Healthcare Provider

You break it, you bought it. Uncle Sam:

  • Recruited them

  • Trained them for war

  • Exposed them to trauma and injury

  • And now denies them cannabis—a plant shown to help with:

    • PTSD

    • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

    • Chronic pain

    • Opioid withdrawal

    • Moral injury

    • Sleep disruption

    • Suicidal ideation

📌 If the VA can prescribe fentanyl, benzos, SSRIs, and stimulants…

Why can’t it authorize cannabis, which has less risk and more efficacy in many cases?

3. Medical Necessity Is a Protected Legal Concept

  • The Randall ruling carved out federal medical necessity as a viable defense and policy path.

  • Veterans with documented treatment resistance qualify under the same logic.

  • Yet there is no Compassionate Use pathway for VA patients, even though they are the most systemically burdened group in U.S. healthcare.

4. This Is a Federal Civil Rights Issue

Denying veterans access to cannabis when they are under exclusive federal care constitutes:

  • Disparate treatment based on jurisdiction (state vs federal)

  • Discrimination based on medical choice

  • Violation of bodily autonomy for patients who can’t “opt out” of federal care without losing benefits

⚖️ Policy Recommendations (Revised for Federal Patient Emphasis)

✅ 1. Create the Federal Veterans Cannabis Access Program

  • Administered by the VA & HHS

  • Authorize cannabis as a federally protected therapy under VA supervision

  • Include a federal patient ID for legal interstate travel, care continuity, and protection

✅ 2. Reinstate the Compassionate IND Program

  • Veterans meet all criteria:

    • No effective alternatives

    • Documented use

    • Medical supervision

    • Federal care eligibility

✅ 3. Deschedule Cannabis

  • Schedule I is scientifically invalid and legally contradictory given the IND precedent

  • Descheduling allows:

    • Interstate access

    • Prescribing by VA doctors

    • Research across federal institutions

✅ 4. Recognize Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) as a Weaponized Diagnosis

  • Enact protections so that cannabis use cannot be used to:

    • Deny access to care or housing

    • Block participation in VA programs or trials

    • Reduce disability ratings or discharge status

🧬 Supporting Evidence

  • RANDALL: Granted legal federal cannabis access under IND #13-387 after proving medical necessity

  • VETERANS: Over 19 million enrolled, with 1 in 5 using cannabis therapeutically

  • VA: Has acknowledged benefits of cannabis in limited studies but remains barred from recommending it

  • STATES: Nearly 40 allow medical cannabis, many for PTSD—but federal patients can’t receive it through their provider

🗣️ Key Talking Point

If the federal government allowed Robert Randall to access cannabis in 1976 to avoid going blind, it can’t deny veterans today the same right—to save their lives.

🔚 Final Word

Veterans didn’t stop being federal property when they left active duty.
Uncle Sam just swapped their uniform for a VA card—and kept the leash.

If we call them heroes, we owe them more than folded flags and overprescribed pills.
We owe them real medicine.
We owe them cannabis.

📎 Next Steps

  • Ready this as a briefing memo for lawmakers, VA officials, and public health departments

  • Package it with “Le Primer of Policy #1” as a downloadable Burn Slow Dossier

  • Adapt for public release as a blog, infographic, or Hill explainer

Shall I prepare this as:

  • A polished PDF briefing?

  • A side-by-side comparison chart: Randall vs Veteran Patient?

  • A short video script or narrated audio drop?

Just say the word, hermano. Uncle Sam’s case file is getting thicker by the minute.

Ricardo Pereyda
Previous

Dem Peppers Again
Next

Le Primer of Policy #1